CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
58% Yes |
42% No |
58% Yes |
42% No |
See how support for each position on “CRISPR Technology” has changed over time for 1.8k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “CRISPR Technology” has changed over time for 1.8k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MMD6HL2wks2W
Yes, but only in terms of preventing disease, disorders, and significant health issues. This should not be applied to physical appearance.
@9N2FJTH6 days6D
Yes, at the state or local level. There should be basic laws implemented to protect human life and dignity.
@9MMW4Z82wks2W
Depending on the exact modifications it is being used for
@9MMQ8BG2wks2W
There should be no genetic modifications to human DNA
@9MM55632wks2W
Yes and no, as long as it doesn’t affect a life..Mainly depends on the situation.
@9MM4HQS2wks2W
I think it depends specifically on who is doing the editing of genomes. It can be helpful but it depends in general.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.